Chemical Composition Comparison

ElementoC95200 (%)C95800 (%)Variation Significance
Cobre81.5 – 84.578.0 – 82.0Nickel content difference
Alumínio8.5 – 10.58.5 – 10.5Identical range
Ferro3.5 – 5.53,0 – 5,0Slight compositional variation
Níquel<1.04.0 – 6.0Key distinguishing factor
Manganês<1.0<1.0Consistent across alloys

Mechanical Performance Comparison

Indicador de DesempenhoC95200C95800Performance Advantage
Resistência à tracção490-580 MPa550-690 MPaC95800 Superior
Força de rendimento240-340 MPa310-410 MPaC95800 Higher
Alongamento15-25%12-20%C95200 Slightly Better
Dureza140-180 HB160-200 HBC95800 Harder

Application Domains Comparison

CriteriaC95200C95800
Primary IndustriesMarine Engineering, General MachineryOffshore, Naval, Chemical Processing
Resistência à corrosãoBomExcelente
Environmental SuitabilityMild to ModerateHarsh, Corrosive Environments
Cost LevelBaseline20-30% Premium

Performance Characteristics Matrix

RecursoC95200C95800
MaquinabilidadeExcelenteBom
ForçaModeradoAlto
Resistência ao desgasteBomSuperior
Custo-efetividadeAltoModerado

Selection Criteria Decision Matrix

Selection FactorRecommend C95200Recommend C95800
Budget ConstraintsTight BudgetFlexible Budget
Performance RequirementsPadrãoExtreme
Corrosion EnvironmentMildSevere
Mechanical StressLow to ModerateAlto

Comparative Cost and Performance Index

Performance MetricC95200C95800Comparative Index
Relative Cost100%120-130%Custo Premium
Strength Index100125Performance Multiplier
Resistência à corrosãoBomExcelenteResistance Factor
Application VersatilityAltoSpecializedAdaptability

Detailed Technical Conclusion

🔍 Key Insights:

  • C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
  • C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
  • Selection depends on specific engineering requirements

Recommendation: Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.