Chemical Composition Comparison
요소 | C95200 (%) | C95800 (%) | Variation Significance |
---|---|---|---|
구리 | 81.5 – 84.5 | 78.0 - 82.0 | Nickel content difference |
알류미늄 | 8.5 – 10.5 | 8.5 – 10.5 | Identical range |
철 | 3.5 – 5.5 | 3.0 – 5.0 | Slight compositional variation |
니켈 | <1.0 | 4.0 – 6.0 | Key distinguishing factor |
망간 | <1.0 | <1.0 | Consistent across alloys |
Mechanical Performance Comparison
Performance Indicator | C95200 | C95800 | Performance Advantage |
---|---|---|---|
인장 강도 | 490-580 MPa | 550-690 MPa | C95800 Superior |
항복 강도 | 240-340 MPa | 310-410 MPa | C95800 Higher |
연장 | 15-25% | 12-20% | C95200 Slightly Better |
경도 | 140-180 HB | 160-200 HB | C95800 Harder |
Application Domains Comparison
Criteria | C95200 | C95800 |
---|---|---|
Primary Industries | Marine Engineering, General Machinery | Offshore, Naval, Chemical Processing |
내식성 | 좋은 | 훌륭한 |
Environmental Suitability | Mild to Moderate | Harsh, Corrosive Environments |
Cost Level | Baseline | 20-30% Premium |
Performance Characteristics Matrix
특징 | C95200 | C95800 |
---|---|---|
가공성 | 훌륭한 | 좋은 |
힘 | 보통의 | 높은 |
내마모성 | 좋은 | 우수한 |
비용 효율성 | 높은 | 보통의 |
Selection Criteria Decision Matrix
선택 계수 | Recommend C95200 | Recommend C95800 |
---|---|---|
Budget Constraints | Tight Budget | Flexible Budget |
성능 요구 사항 | 기준 | Extreme |
Corrosion Environment | Mild | Severe |
기계적 응력 | Low to Moderate | 높은 |
Comparative Cost and Performance Index
성능 메트릭 | C95200 | C95800 | Comparative Index |
---|---|---|---|
상대 비용 | 100% | 120-130% | 비용 프리미엄 |
Strength Index | 100 | 125 | Performance Multiplier |
내식성 | 좋은 | 훌륭한 | Resistance Factor |
Application Versatility | 높은 | Specialized | Adaptability |
Detailed Technical Conclusion
🔍 Key Insights:
- C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
- C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
- Selection depends on specific engineering requirements
Recommendation: Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.