Chemical Composition Comparison
| 元素 | C95200 (%) | C95800(%) | Variation Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 銅 | 81.5 – 84.5 | 78.0 – 82.0 | Nickel content difference |
| 鋁 | 8.5 – 10.5 | 8.5 – 10.5 | Identical range |
| 鐵 | 3.5 – 5.5 | 3.0 – 5.0 | Slight compositional variation |
| 鎳 | <1.0 | 4.0 – 6.0 | Key distinguishing factor |
| 錳 | <1.0 | <1.0 | Consistent across alloys |
Mechanical Performance Comparison
| 績效指標 | C95200 | C95800 | Performance Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 抗拉強度 | 490-580 MPa | 550-690 MPa | C95800 Superior |
| 屈服強度 | 240-340 MPa | 310-410 MPa | C95800 Higher |
| 伸長 | 15-25％ | 12-20％ | C95200 Slightly Better |
| 硬度 | 140-180 HB | 160-200HB | C95800 Harder |
Application Domains Comparison
| Criteria | C95200 | C95800 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Industries | Marine Engineering, General Machinery | Offshore, Naval, Chemical Processing |
| 耐腐蝕性能 | 好的 | 優秀的 |
| Environmental Suitability | Mild to Moderate | Harsh, Corrosive Environments |
| Cost Level | 基線 | 20-30% Premium |
Performance Characteristics Matrix
| 特徵 | C95200 | C95800 |
|---|---|---|
| 可加工性 | 優秀的 | 好的 |
| 力量 | 緩和 | 高的 |
| 耐磨性 | 好的 | 優越的 |
| 成本效益 | 高的 | 緩和 |
Selection Criteria Decision Matrix
| 選擇因子 | Recommend C95200 | Recommend C95800 |
|---|---|---|
| Budget Constraints | Tight Budget | Flexible Budget |
| 性能要求 | 標準 | Extreme |
| 腐蝕環境 | 輕微 | 劇烈 |
| Mechanical Stress | 低到中等 | 高的 |
Comparative Cost and Performance Index
| 性能指標 | C95200 | C95800 | Comparative Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| 相對成本 | 100% | 120-130% | 費用溢價 |
| Strength Index | 100 | 125 | Performance Multiplier |
| 耐腐蝕性能 | 好的 | 優秀的 | Resistance Factor |
| Application Versatility | 高的 | Specialized | Adaptability |
Detailed Technical Conclusion
🔍 Key Insights:
- C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
- C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
- Selection depends on specific engineering requirements
推薦： Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.