International Equivalent Standards

Detailed Equivalency Mapping

NazioneStandard CodeDesignazione della legaComposition SimilarityPerformance MatchKey Applications
GermaniaDIN CuSn12Bronzo di stagno100%Reference StandardPrecision Engineering
Stati Uniti d'AmericaASTM B124UNS C9130095%AltoBearings & Bushings
UKBS 1400PB293%SubstantialComponenti marini
GiapponeJIS H5120CAC40690%BeneMechanical Parts
CinaGB/T 5231QSn12-388%ComparableMacchinari industriali

Analisi della composizione chimica

Typical Composition Range (%)

  • Copper: 86.5 – 89.5
  • Tin: 11.5 – 12.5
  • Lead: 0.05 max
  • Phosphorus: 0.01 – 0.35

Caratteristiche di performance

Mechanical Properties Comparison

  1. Resistenza alla trazione
    • CuSn12: 480-520 MPa
    • Equivalent Alloys: 460-510 MPa
  2. Resa
    • CuSn12: 280-340 MPa
    • Equivalent Alloys: 260-330 MPa
  3. Allungamento
    • CuSn12: 15-25%
    • Equivalent Alloys: 12-22%

Domini di applicazione critici

Recommended Usage Scenarios

  • Cuscinetti e boccole
  • Marine Engineering Components
  • Wear-Resistant Mechanical Parts
  • Low-Speed Sliding Mechanisms
  • Corrosion-Resistant Environments

Selection Criteria Checklist

Key Considerations

  1. Mechanical Load Requirements
  2. Friction and Wear Characteristics
  3. Resistenza alla corrosione
  4. Intervallo di temperatura operativa
  5. Cost Constraints

Technical Limitations

Substitution Challenges

  • Slight variations in thermal conductivity
  • Microstructural differences
  • Specific lubrication requirements
  • Potential performance variations

Economic Analysis

Cost Comparison (Relative to CuSn12)

  • ASTM C91300: -3% to +2%
  • BS PB2: 0% to +5%
  • JIS CAC406: -2% to +3%
  • GB QSn12-3: -5% to 0%

Emerging Trends

Future Developments

  • Advanced surface treatments
  • Nano-structured bronze alloys
  • Improved manufacturing techniques
  • Enhanced corrosion resistance

Conclusione

Selecting the optimal CuSn12 equivalent requires comprehensive analysis of specific engineering requirements, environmental conditions, and performance metrics.

Final Recommendation: Conduct thorough testing and consult metallurgical experts before final material selection.