Chemical Composition Comparison

ElementoC95200 (%)C95800 (%)Variation Significance
Rame81.5 – 84.578,0 – 82,0Nickel content difference
Alluminio8.5 – 10.58.5 – 10.5Identical range
Ferro da stiro3.5 – 5.53.0 – 5.0Slight compositional variation
Nichel<1.04.0 – 6.0Key distinguishing factor
Manganese<1.0<1.0Consistent across alloys

Mechanical Performance Comparison

Performance IndicatorC95200C95800Performance Advantage
Resistenza alla trazione490-580 MPa550-690 MPaC95800 Superior
Resa240-340 MPa310-410 MPaC95800 Higher
Allungamento15-25%12-20%C95200 Slightly Better
Durezza140-180 HB160-200 HBC95800 Harder

Application Domains Comparison

CriteriaC95200C95800
Primary IndustriesMarine Engineering, General MachineryOffshore, Naval, Chemical Processing
Resistenza alla corrosioneBeneEccellente
Environmental SuitabilityMild to ModerateHarsh, Corrosive Environments
Cost LevelBaseline20-30% Premium

Performance Characteristics Matrix

CaratteristicaC95200C95800
lavorabilitàEccellenteBene
ForzaModerareAlto
Resistenza all'usuraBeneSuperiore
Efficacia dei costiAltoModerare

Selection Criteria Decision Matrix

Selection FactorRecommend C95200Recommend C95800
Budget ConstraintsTight BudgetFlexible Budget
Requisiti di prestazioneStandardExtreme
Corrosion EnvironmentMildSevere
Mechanical StressDa basso a moderatoAlto

Comparative Cost and Performance Index

Metrica delle prestazioniC95200C95800Comparative Index
Relative Cost100%120-130%Cost Premium
Strength Index100125Performance Multiplier
Resistenza alla corrosioneBeneEccellenteResistance Factor
Application VersatilityAltoSpecializedAdaptability

Detailed Technical Conclusion

🔍 Key Insights:

  • C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
  • C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
  • Selection depends on specific engineering requirements

Recommendation: Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.