Chemical Composition Comparison

ÉlémentC95200 (%)C95800 (%)Variation Significance
Le cuivre81.5 – 84.578.0 – 82.0Nickel content difference
Aluminium8.5 – 10.58.5 – 10.5Identical range
Le fer3.5 – 5.53,0 – 5,0Slight compositional variation
Nickel<1.04.0 – 6.0Key distinguishing factor
Manganèse<1.0<1.0Consistent across alloys

Mechanical Performance Comparison

Indicateur de performanceC95200C95800Performance Advantage
Résistance à la traction490-580 MPa550-690 MPaC95800 Superior
Limite d'élasticité240-340 MPa310-410 MPaC95800 Higher
Élongation15-25%12-20%C95200 Slightly Better
Dureté140-180 HB160-200 HBC95800 Harder

Application Domains Comparison

CriteriaC95200C95800
Primary IndustriesMarine Engineering, General MachineryOffshore, Naval, Chemical Processing
Résistance à la corrosionBonExcellent
Environmental SuitabilityMild to ModerateHarsh, Corrosive Environments
Cost LevelBaseline20-30% Premium

Performance Characteristics Matrix

CaractéristiqueC95200C95800
UsinabilitéExcellentBon
ForceModéréHaut
Résistance à l'usureBonSupérieur
RentabilitéHautModéré

Selection Criteria Decision Matrix

Facteur de sélectionRecommend C95200Recommend C95800
Budget ConstraintsTight BudgetFlexible Budget
Performance RequirementsStandardExtreme
Corrosion EnvironmentMildSevere
Mechanical StressFaible à modéréHaut

Comparative Cost and Performance Index

Performance MetricC95200C95800Comparative Index
Coût relatif100%120-130%Cost Premium
Strength Index100125Performance Multiplier
Résistance à la corrosionBonExcellentResistance Factor
Application VersatilityHautSpecializedAdaptability

Detailed Technical Conclusion

🔍 Key Insights:

  • C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
  • C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
  • Selection depends on specific engineering requirements

Recommendation: Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.