Estándares equivalentes internacionales
Detailed Equivalency Mapping
País | Código estándar | Designación de aleación | Similitud de composición | Partido de rendimiento | Key Applications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alemania | DIN CuSn12 | Bronce de estaño | 100% | Estándar de referencia | Precision Engineering |
Estados Unidos | ASTM B124 | UNS C91300 | 95% | Alto | Bearings & Bushings |
Reino Unido | BS 1400 | PB2 | 93% | Sustancial | Componentes marinos |
Japón | El H5120 | CA406 | 90% | Bien | Mechanical Parts |
porcelana | GB/T 5231 | QSn12-3 | 88% | Comparable | Maquinaria industrial |
Análisis de composición química
Rango de composición típico (%)
- Copper: 86.5 – 89.5
- Tin: 11.5 – 12.5
- Lead: 0.05 max
- Phosphorus: 0.01 – 0.35
Características de presentación
Comparación de propiedades mecánicas
- Fuerza de Tensión
- CuSn12: 480-520 MPa
- Equivalent Alloys: 460-510 MPa
- Fuerza de producción
- CuSn12: 280-340 MPa
- Equivalent Alloys: 260-330 MPa
- Alargamiento
- CuSn12: 15-25%
- Equivalent Alloys: 12-22%
Dominios de aplicación crítica
Recommended Usage Scenarios
- Bearings and Bushings
- Marine Engineering Components
- Wear-Resistant Mechanical Parts
- Low-Speed Sliding Mechanisms
- Corrosion-Resistant Environments
Selection Criteria Checklist
Consideraciones clave
- Mechanical Load Requirements
- Friction and Wear Characteristics
- Resistencia a la corrosión
- Rango de temperatura de funcionamiento
- Cost Constraints
Technical Limitations
Substitution Challenges
- Slight variations in thermal conductivity
- Microstructural differences
- Specific lubrication requirements
- Potential performance variations
Economic Analysis
Cost Comparison (Relative to CuSn12)
- ASTM C91300: -3% to +2%
- BS PB2: 0% to +5%
- JIS CAC406: -2% to +3%
- GB QSn12-3: -5% to 0%
Emerging Trends
Future Developments
- Advanced surface treatments
- Nano-structured bronze alloys
- Improved manufacturing techniques
- Enhanced corrosion resistance
Conclusión
Selecting the optimal CuSn12 equivalent requires comprehensive analysis of specific engineering requirements, environmental conditions, and performance metrics.
Final Recommendation: Conduct thorough testing and consult metallurgical experts before final material selection.