Chemical Composition Comparison

ElementoC95200 (%)C95800 (%)Variation Significance
Cobre81.5 – 84.578,0 – 82,0Nickel content difference
Aluminio8.5 – 10.58.5 – 10.5Identical range
Planchar3.5 - 5.53,0 – 5,0Slight compositional variation
Níquel<1.04.0 - 6.0Key distinguishing factor
Manganeso<1.0<1.0Consistent across alloys

Mechanical Performance Comparison

Indicador de desempeñoC95200C95800Performance Advantage
Fuerza de Tensión490-580 MPa550-690 MPaC95800 Superior
Fuerza de producción240-340 MPa310-410 MPaC95800 Higher
Alargamiento15-25%12-20%C95200 Slightly Better
Dureza140-180 HB160-200 HBC95800 Harder

Application Domains Comparison

CriteriaC95200C95800
Primary IndustriesMarine Engineering, General MachineryOffshore, Naval, Chemical Processing
Resistencia a la corrosiónBienExcelente
Environmental SuitabilityMild to ModerateHarsh, Corrosive Environments
Cost LevelBaseline20-30% premium

Performance Characteristics Matrix

RasgoC95200C95800
MaquinabilidadExcelenteBien
FuerzaModeradoAlto
Resistencia al desgasteBienSuperior
RentabilidadAltoModerado

Selection Criteria Decision Matrix

Factor de selecciónRecommend C95200Recommend C95800
Budget ConstraintsTight BudgetFlexible Budget
Requisitos de rendimientoEstándarExtreme
Corrosion EnvironmentLeveSevero
Estrés mecánicoBajo a moderadoAlto

Comparative Cost and Performance Index

Performance MetricC95200C95800Comparative Index
Costo relativo100%120-130%Cost Premium
Strength Index100125Performance Multiplier
Resistencia a la corrosiónBienExcelenteResistance Factor
Application VersatilityAltoEspecializadoAdaptability

Detailed Technical Conclusion

🔍 Key Insights:

  • C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
  • C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
  • Selection depends on specific engineering requirements

Recommendation: Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.