Chemical Composition Comparison

ElementoC95200 (%)C95800 (%)Variation Significance
Cobre81.5 – 84.578,0 – 82,0Nickel content difference
Aluminio8.5 – 10.58.5 – 10.5Identical range
Planchar3.5 – 5.53,0 – 5,0Slight compositional variation
Níquel<1.04.0 – 6.0Key distinguishing factor
Manganeso<1.0<1.0Consistent across alloys

Mechanical Performance Comparison

Indicador de desempeñoC95200C95800Performance Advantage
Fuerza de Tensión490-580 MPa550-690 MPaC95800 Superior
Fuerza de producción240-340 MPa310-410 MPaC95800 Higher
Alargamiento15-25%12-20%C95200 Slightly Better
Dureza140-180 HB160-200 HBC95800 Harder

Application Domains Comparison

CriteriaC95200C95800
Primary IndustriesMarine Engineering, General MachineryOffshore, Naval, Chemical Processing
Resistencia a la corrosiónBienExcelente
Environmental SuitabilityMild to ModerateHarsh, Corrosive Environments
Cost LevelBaseline20-30% Premium

Performance Characteristics Matrix

RasgoC95200C95800
MaquinabilidadExcelenteBien
FuerzaModeradoAlto
Resistencia al desgasteBienSuperior
RentabilidadAltoModerado

Selection Criteria Decision Matrix

Factor de selecciónRecommend C95200Recommend C95800
Budget ConstraintsTight BudgetFlexible Budget
Performance RequirementsEstándarExtreme
Corrosion EnvironmentLeveSevero
Estrés mecánicoBajo a moderadoAlto

Comparative Cost and Performance Index

Performance MetricC95200C95800Comparative Index
Costo relativo100%120-130%Cost Premium
Strength Index100125Performance Multiplier
Resistencia a la corrosiónBienExcelenteResistance Factor
Application VersatilityAltoSpecializedAdaptability

Detailed Technical Conclusion

🔍 Key Insights:

  • C95200: Versatile, cost-effective aluminum bronze
  • C95800: High-performance nickel aluminum bronze
  • Selection depends on specific engineering requirements

Recommendation: Conduct comprehensive application-specific testing to validate alloy performance.